Saturday, August 29, 2015

Shock investigation: Pentagon accelerates plan to confiscate guns, prosecute US conservatives.

The US Army Trains for Martial Law in the USA


Shock investigation: Pentagon accelerates plan to confiscate guns, prosecute US conservatives.

The federal government has been in a big hurry to build a 300 acre city in just 2 years at an expense of $96 million in taxpayer funds in order to train the military “for problems we don’t even know we have yet.”

If you’ve been following Infowars, you’ve seen them document over and over again what they’re training for with a detailed American city like this:

...Martial Law within this nation

And now, The Telegraph is confirming the construction of this small town military simulation that will be used to train troops for combat against the American people.


Unlike the urban training centers we’ve seen before where the buildings are just empty concrete block structures or even plywood facades, this town is very detailed with glass windows, handicap parking signs, speed limit signs, logos on the subway that match the DC metro, and even a small town steeple (that was originally claimed to be a mosque).

Read related: ONE False Flag Away From FEMA's Extermination Camps;

They’ve made it clear in manual after manual, scenario after scenario that they perceive the enemy as gun owners, limited government conservatives, libertarians and Christians.


The U.S. Army Built a ‘Fake City’ in Virginia to Practice Military Occupation

The 300 acre ‘fake city’ complete with a sports stadium, bank, school, and an underground subway in order to train for unspecified future combat scenarios.

While the city was ostensibly built to prepare U.S. troops for the occupation of cities abroad, some will undoubtedly fear that the real intention could be closer to home. Although the site includes a mosque, the town looks American in every other way, with signs in English.
The fact that, as the Telegraph reports, “The subway carriages even carry the same logo as the carriages in Washington DC,” could suggest that the site was built to double both as a foreign city and a mock domestic town.
According to Colonel John P. Petkosek, “This is the place where we can be creative, where we can come up with solutions for problems that we don’t even know we have yet... This is where we’ll look at solutions for the future–material solutions and non-material solutions... anything from how you’re going to operate in a subterranean environment to how you dismount a Humvee to avoid an IED strike.”
The increasing demonization of domestic political groups as extremists has prompted numerous scenarios where commentators have suggested that U.S. Army and National Guard personnel could be needed to quell civil unrest.

Read related: DHS Insider Warns: “Preparations Have Been Finalized to Respond to a Crisis of Unprecedented Magnitude Within the United States”;

In 2012, an academic study about the future use of the military as a peacekeeping force within the United States written by a retired Army Colonel depicted a shocking scenario in which the U.S. Army is used to restore order to a town that has been seized by Tea Party “insurrectionists”.

The study dovetailed with a leaked U.S. Army manual which revealed plans for the military to carry out “Civil Disturbance Operations” during which troops would be used domestically to quell riots, confiscate firearms and even kill Americans on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.

The manual also describes how prisoners will be processed through temporary internment camps under the guidance of U.S. Army FM 3-19.40 Internment/Resettlement Operations, which outlines how internees would be “re-educated” into developing an “appreciation of U.S. policies” while detained in prison camps inside the United States.

Fort Hood soldiers are also being taught by their superiors that Christians, Tea Party supporters and anti-abortion activists represent a radical terror threat, mirroring rhetoric backed by the Department of Homeland Security which frames “liberty lovers” as domestic extremists.

Last year, former Navy SEAL Ben Smith warned that the Obama administration is asking top brass in the military if they would be comfortable with disarming U.S. citizens, a litmus test that includes gauging whether they would be prepared to order NCOs to fire on Americans.

During a recent Ohio National Guard exercise, second amendment proponents were portrayed as domestic terrorists as part of a mock disaster drill.

Source: Info Wars;

After 45 years Now here is the big picture behind the fake moon-landings and 9/11 revealed

After 45 years Now here is the big picture behind the fake moon-landings and 9/11 revealed


The moon-landing is fake but that's not what it's all about. You were supposed to find this out. It was a test in mass psychology for 911. The white race has flaws, it cannot 1. get the whole picture 2. understand the end goal is the extermination of the white race and the NWO.

The Jews work with 'the power of few'. If only 100 people watch this vid and 10 contact Congress and 3 Congress members stand up together and start telling the truth everything can change literally in minutes.

This is an example letter.
Dear member of Congress,
Recently I learned a lot about history and it seems many big events didn't go like we were taught at history class.

Especially the Russian revolution and China under Mao seem to be drenched in Jewish influence. As a matter of fact communism is invented by a Jew named Moses Levy Mordecai who called himself Karl Marx. After the revolution they murdered about 75 million Russians. In China they controlled Mao and murdered about 20 million Chinese.

As crazy as it sounds, even WW I and II seem to be set up by them to get Palestine and later make it Israel. This is explained by the honest Jew Benjamin Freedman, so there's nothing 'antisemetic' about it.


As a matter of fact, the whole 'antisemitism' is part of a set of rules the top of the Jews use to takeover countries and later the world. Maybe this seems far fetched but if we look at the facts, they do control Hollywood, CBS, ABC etc. and our moest important bank, the Fed. Volcker was Jewish, so was Greenspan, Bernanke and now Yellen. In their rules it says 'use antisemitism', but also 'control the media' and 'control the banks'. How many 'coincidences' can there be?

Talking about coincidences, Mao was surrounded by Jews and he took the guns of the Chinese people, now Obama is again surrounded by Jews and wants to take our guns. Again a 'coincidence'? I'm asking you as a fellow human being to seriously think about all this and realize the Jews were kicked out of more then a 100 Western countries. 

They work with 'every great empire is destroyed from within' Aipac plays a big part in this. I hope you will understand that at one point it's not about money anymore.
When people that spread money, with a creepy pyramid and allseeing eye on it mind you, are taught that the white race needs to be terminated everything is put in perspective.

The Talmud teaches
· "The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts." (Talmud: Baba Mezia 114b)
· "It is permitted to take the body and the life of a non-Jew." (Sepher Ikkarim IIIc, 25)

I hope you study the 'Russian' revolution, then you will see that after the revolution all the old politicians were killed and the new government consisted for 80% of Jews.

These are all facts. Please come to your senses and protect the innocent Americans before it's too late.

Thank you,



Russia Just Sent out a Message NATO Should Better Listen To | The Saker

Russia Just Sent out a Message NATO Should Better Listen To

The key take away from the new official Russian naval doctrine is that Putin - together with his military men - has sent a clear message that NATO encroachment is unacceptable
 Wed, Jul 29
Aboard the 'Admiral Gorshkov'
Russia has recently published her new official Naval Doctrine. The full document can be downloaded from the Presidency’s website here (in Russian).
To be honest, there is nothing earth shattering in this document. The document explains the purpose of this doctrine, the missions of the Russian Navy and includes a region by region review of the challenges and opportunities for Russia on the world’s oceans, including the Arctic and Antarctic regions. But there is one sentence which, I think, deserves a lot of attention.  On page 20, in the section 54 it says:
“Определяющим фактором в отношениях с НАТО остаются неприемлемость для Российской Федерации планов продвижения военной инфраструктуры альянса к ее границам и попытки придания ему глобальных функций”.
Which I would translate as follows:
“A defining factor in (our) relations with NATO remains that for Russia the following is unacceptable: the alliance’s plan to move its infrastructure  to the borders of Russia and the attempts to give the alliance a global role“.
As somebody who has translated Russian official documents for a living for many years I can tell you that the Russians are extremely precise in their use of words and that they choice of this or that word or expression is considered very carefully, often with a maniacal attention to detail. 
So when this official, President-approved, document says that it is unacceptable for Russia that NATO is trying to grant itself a global role – this is at least as official a statement as any public declaration by Foreign Minister Lavrov. Except for Lavrov was not tasked to deliver this message. Take a look at who was:

From let to right: Victor Chirkov, Dmitri Rogozin, Vladimir Putin, Sergei Shoigu and Anatolii Sidorov
From let to right: Victor Chirkov, Dmitri Rogozin, Vladimir Putin, Sergei Shoigu and Anatolii Sidorov
This photo was taken on board the frigate “Admiral Gorshkov” and includes Victor Chirkov, C-in-C of the Russian Navy, Dmitri Rogozin, Deputy Prime Minister of Russia in charge of military matters, Vladimir Putin, Defense Minister Shoigu and the C-in-C of the Western Military District General Anatolii Sidorov. In other words, these are the men who would be in charge of fighting NATO should a war break-up.
There is clearly a ‘message’ sent here, and it is not sent to Obama, Merkel or any other western politician, nor is it sent to the public opinion of any country, but it is a message sent to those who will carefully analyze this document and this event: US and NATO defense analysts and their bosses and, for them, the message is very clear: we will not let you prevail.
I have often written here that in the Russian culture making threats is seen as a sign of weakness.  So none of the above should be seen as the Russians threatening anybody.  The recent British and US hysteria about Putin threatening the West with nuclear war is utter nonsense. 
In fact, the Russian warning is clearly tied to current hostile actions by NATO, namely placing NATO forces on the Russian border and trying to become a global, planetary, police force or, better, colonial pacification and authority enforcement force.
So all the Russians are really doing is going on the record and declaring that they will oppose and resist the Empire’s attempts to subdue Russia or achieve planetary hegemony.
Putin recently gave an interview to a Swiss TV channel.  To the question “do you believe that a war in Europe is possible?” Putin replied “I hope not. But I really wish that Europe would show more independence and sovereignty and was capable of defending her own national interests, the interests of her people and her countries“.
I don’t know about you – but I find that “I hope not” very disturbing, to say the least. Do you think that the people of Europe will ever wake up?

Friday, August 28, 2015

Why ICC is not a good idea | BY SHAZELINA ZAINUL ABIDIN

Why ICC is not a good idea 

BY SHAZELINA ZAINUL ABIDIN 

12 AUGUST 2015  

WHEN Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was tragically “downed” on July 17 last year, killing all 298 on board, the first international reaction was one of shock. This initial reaction quickly gave way to anger when it became clear that someone, somewhere was responsible for the tragedy. Some observers reacted to the news of MH17 by pressing Malaysia to join the International Criminal Court (ICC), the one body that could reputedly bring the perpetrators of this heinous crime to justice. 

Luckily, these opportunistic voices were drowned out by the voices of reason, outlining why the ICC was not the solution. True, by joining the ICC, we would be able to take grave criminal matters to the international body, but at what cost? In the 13 years since the establishment of the ICC, member states to the Rome Statute have had to fork out more than US$1 billion (RM4 billion) for the upkeep of the court. 

Yet, the ICC has only had two convictions in that same time: those of Thomas Lubanga Dilyo and Germain Katanga. Who, you ask. Precisely the point. These were semi-famous players in an African nation already rife with strife. The ICC did not make that big an impact — Lubanga was already in prison, so it was just a matter of transferring him from his bare prison cell in Kinshasa to a posh prison accommodation with more facilities in The Hague. 

The international community pays for the lavish lifestyle of these prisoners while they await trial in the distant future. This is money that could have gone towards the poor and the impoverished in a country, any country. If Malaysia joins the ICC, its annual contribution to the ICC would be substantial — between US$1.5 million and US$2 million. It is financial grounds why Malaysia should not join. The ICC’s track record of investigating and convicting criminals is one that leaves much to be desired. 

If any government agency had that kind of output, it would have long been closed down. Yet, the ICC remains open for business because the Westphalian world is mainly solidarist rather than pluralist. Solidarists are those who feel for all of humankind, the environmental activists among us who want to see more intervention and less state sovereignty. 

Pluralists are those who, while empathising with their fellow man, also understand that not all of the world’s ills can be fixed by giving away our national treasures. Theoretically, this is why we should not join the ICC. The ICC has jurisdiction over crimes that are heinous enough to give a grown man nightmares for the rest of his life. However, the nine “situations” under investigation by the ICC are all centred around African states. 

Crimes in non-African states have been kept out of the ICC by dint of political wrangling and diplomatic negotiation. For a court that is supposed to serve only the interests of justice, there are a whole lot of other interests being served as well. The Gaza flotilla incident, involving the Mari Mara and 12 Malaysians, for example, was not of “sufficient gravity” to merit the time and attention of the ICC. The ICC prosecutor proclaimed this almost unilaterally. 

Politically, therefore, this is why Malaysia should not join the ICC. In our desire to see justice for the MH17 tragedy, we should not commit an even greater mistake by rushing headlong into joining the ICC. If we want to bring the perpetrators to justice at the ICC, under which crime would we classify the downing of MH17? If we say it is a war crime, Ukraine would be beaming all along because this would “up” its internal conflict into a war of international proportions. 

We would be reducing MH17 into a pawn in this Crimean game of chess. If we say it is a crime against humanity, then we have to show that the attack was systematic and widespread. MH17 was not — it was a one-off and unique tragedy, practically unparalleled anywhere else and, hopefully, not repeatable. If it is genocide, then we would have to show that the perpetrators were targeting a particular nationality, ethnicity or religious group. 

There were 11 nationalities on board — it would be impossible for any one group to have realistically been targeted. The crime of aggression, the fourth heinous crime under the Rome Statute, has yet to enter into force. So, no claims can be made to the ICC under the crime of aggression. If Malaysia joins the ICC, it needs to do so on its own terms, not because it was steamrollered into it. 

Ironically, July 17 is the Day of International Criminal Justice, celebrated every year because it marks the adoption of the Rome Statute in 1998. It is now also the day that marks the downing of MH17. Hopefully, when we next observe the Day of International Criminal Justice, those responsible for the downing of MH17 would have been brought to justice and the world would know the truth.

Hopefully, also, Malaysia would still have the good sense to stay out of the ICC family. The writer is a Malaysian diplomat who has served in the United Nations (New York) and is pursuing her PhD at the University of Sheffield

Read More : http://www.nst.com.my/node/95777

Western media would rather the general public knew little of what was going on in Yemen

 Total War in Yemen Totally Ignored by Western Media

Author: Tony Cartalucci

27.08.2015

With almost a whimper, the Western media reported that the US-backed regimes of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and their auxiliary fighters drawn from Al Qaeda have begun carrying out what is the ground invasion of Yemen. Along with an ongoing naval blockade and months of bombing raids, the ground invasion adds a lethal new dimension to the conflict – for both sides.

Landing at the port city of Aden on Yemen’s southern tip, it is reported that an “armor brigade” consisting of between 1,000 – 3,000 troops primarily from the UAE are now moving north, their ultimate destination Sana’a, the capital of Yemen.

Columns of the UAE’s French-built Leclerc main battle tanks were seen moving out of the port city though their numbers are difficult to establish. Reports claiming that the UAE unit is brigade-sized might indicate as many as 100 tanks involved – a third of the UAE’s total armored force.

The bold move comes after months of frustrating failures for the two Arabian regimes. Their Yemeni proxies – loyalists of the ousted president Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi – have proven all but useless in fighting Houthi fighters across most of Yemen despite air superiority provided to them by their Arabian allies. And while it appears the well-equipped Arab forces are able to concentrate firepower, overwhelming Houthi fighters in pitched battles, the ability for Saudi, UAE, and Al Qaeda forces to actually hold territory they move through is questionable at best.

Opportunity

The Roman Empire throughout much of its reign was feared as invincible. After suffering several major defeats, the veneer of invincibility began to peel and along with it crumbled inevitably their empire. Likewise, Western hegemony has been propped up by the illusion of military superiority on the battlefield. By carefully picking its battles and avoiding critical defeats, the West, and the US in particular, has maintained this illusion of military invincibility

As the US moves against nations with larger, better equipped and trained armies, it has elected to use proxies to fight on its behalf. Thus, any humiliating defeat could be compartmentalized.

However, by most accounts the war in Yemen is not only a proxy war between Iran and the Persian Gulf monarchies, it is one of several such conflicts raging regionally that constitutes a wider proxy war between the US and its regional allies on one side, and Iran, Syria, Russia, and even China on the other.

With the presence of Western main battle tanks in Yemen attempting to move north, the opportunity now presents itself to punch holes through this illusion of Western invincibility. Yemen as the graveyard for an alleged brigade of French-built Leclerc main battle tanks would be one such hole. It would also set the UAE’s extraterritorial military ambitions back, if not overturn them entirely, and finally, would leave whatever fighting was left in Yemen to the Saudis who have thus far proven incompetent.

Perhaps this is one of the many reasons the Western media has decided not to cover the events unfolding in Yemen.

Yemen Vs. Ukraine

One might ask how – in the context of international law – it is possible for unelected absolute autocracies like Saudi Arabia and the UAE to intervene militarily in Yemen with naval blockades, aerial bombardments, and now an overt ground invasion including armor columns to restore an ousted regime. This is done with seemingly little concern from the United Nations and with the enthusiastic support both politically and militarily of the United States.

The answer to this question becomes more confounding still when considering Western condemnation of Russia for any attempt to support or defend the ousted government of Ukraine, a nation now overrun by NATO-backed Neo-Nazi militias who in turn are backing a criminal regime in Kiev which includes foreigners assigned to cabinet positions and even as governors. Saudi and UAE military aggression in Yemen makes it increasingly difficult for the West to maintain the illusion of moral superiority regarding Ukraine.

Russia’s relative restraint when compared to US-backed aggression on the Arabian Peninsula exposes once again the pervasive hypocrisy consuming Western legitimacy.

This may be yet another reason the Western media refuses to cover the events unfolding in Yemen.

Responsibility to Protect…?


After NATO’s attempt to invoke the “responsibility to protect” (R2P) as justification for the destruction of Libya, it became clear that NATO was merely hiding behind the principles of humanitarian concern, not upholding them. And while it may be difficult to believe, there are still those across the Western media and policy think-tanks attempting to use R2P to justify further military aggression against nations like Syria.

However, R2P is conveniently absent amid what little talk of Yemen that does take place in the Western media. US-backed blockades and months of aerial bombardments have tipped Yemen toward a humanitarian catastrophe. Not only does both the UN and the West fail to demand an end to the bombings and blockades, the West has continued to underwrite Saudi Arabia and the UAE’s military adventure in Yemen.

The carnage and injustice visited upon Yemen serves as yet another stark example of how the West and its institutions, including the United Nations, are the greatest dangers to global peace and stability, using the pretext of defending such ideals as a means to instead undo them.

Considering this, we discover yet another potential reason the Western media’s coverage of Yemen is muted.

It remains to be seen how the Houthi fighters react to the ground invasion of Yemen by Emirati troops. Dealing severe losses to the UAE’s armor while continuing to weather aerial bombardment may see the stalling or even the withdrawal of this latest incursion. Not unlike the 2006 Lebanon War where Hezbollah fighters expertly used terrain to negate Israeli advantages in airpower and armor, forcing an early end to the fighting, the Houthis may yet answer this latest move by US-backed proxies operating in Yemen.

Perhaps this possibility above all, is why the Western media would rather the general public knew little of what was going on in Yemen. It would represent yet another conventional Western-equipped proxy army defeated by irregular forces in yet another failed campaign fought in the interests of Wall Street and Washington. While the Western media refuses to cover the events unfolding in Yemen with the attention and honesty they deserve, the conflict is nonetheless pivotal, and may determine the outcome of other proxy wars raging across the Middle East and North Africa, and even beyond.

Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazineNew Eastern Outlook”.

Saturday, August 22, 2015

The government of the United States stands for one thing and one thing only: Evil. By: Paul Craig Roberts

Paul Craig Roberts: "America Is A Gulag"

 by Paul Craig Roberts,
America’s First Black President is a traitor to his race and also to justice.

Obama has permitted the corruption of our US Department of Justice Dept.(sic), over which he wields reckless authority, to overturn the ruling of a US Federal Court of Appeals that prisoners sentenced illegally to longer terms than the law permits must be released once the legal portion of their sentence is served. The DOJ, devoid of all integrity, compassion, and sense of justice, said that “finality” of conviction was more important than justice.
Indeed, the US Justice (sic) Department’s motto is: “Justice? We don’t need no stinkin’ justice!”
Alec Karakatsanis, a civil rights attorney and co-founder of Equal Justice Under Law, tells his story here:http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/18/opinion/president-obamas-department-of-injustice.html?_r=1
The concept of “finality” was an invention of a harebrained Republican conservative academic lionized by the Republican Federalist Society. 

In years past conservatives believed—indeed, still do—that the criminal justice system coddles criminals by allowing too many appeals against their unlawful convictions. The appeals were granted by judges who thought that the system was supposed to serve justice, but conservatives demonized justice as something that enabled criminals. A succession of Republican presidents turned the US Supreme Court into an organization that only serves the interests of private corporations. Justice is nowhere in the picture.
Appeals Court Judge, James Hill, a member of the court that ruled that prisoners did not have to serve the illegal portion of their sentences, when confronted with the Obama/DOJ deep-sixing of justice had this to say:
“A judicial system that values finality over justice is morally bankrupt.”
Obama’s DOJ says that there are too many black prisoners illegally sentenced to be released without upsetting the crime-fearful white population. 
According to Obama’s Justice (sic) Department, the fears of brainwashed whites take precedence over justice.
Judge Hill said that the DOJ “calls itself, without a trace of irony, the Department of Justice.”
Judge Hill added: We used to call such systems as people sitting in prison serving sentences that were illegally imposed “gulags.” “Now we call them the United States.”
America is a gulag. We are ruled by a government that is devoid of all morality, all integrity, all compassion, all justice. The government of the United States stands for one thing and one thing only: Evil.
It is just as Chavez told the United Nations in 2006 referring to President George W. Bush’s address to the assembly the day before: “Yesterday, at this very podium, Satan himself stood speaking as if he owned the world. You can still smell the sulfur.”
If you are an American and you cannot smell the sulfur, you are tightly locked down in The Matrix. God help you. There is no Neo to rescue you. And you are too brainwashed and ignorant to be rescued by me.

You are part of the new Captive Nation.

Moscow's Top Man in Donbass Says All-Out War Will Start Soon (Video) This time it is believable

Moscow's Top Man in Donbass Says All-Out War Will Start Soon (Video)

This is from yesterday. This time it is believable



Friday, August 21, 2015

We Could Cope Without a UN Security Council

We Could Cope Without a UN Security Council
We will cope without UN 

Can a normal person to continue to go to some club, and paid, where he is constantly abused and fined? Imagine that Russia announced the suspension of its membership in the UN. What to begin! And what will? Two weeks mocked his nervous system - viewed Ukrainian news, just to make sure that the obvious. OSCE Donbass performs one and only one mission - to dig up any sort of charge on the militia in violation of the Minsk Agreement. 

On the Ukrainian side there is no observer. They are not interested in how much heavy artillery amassed APU on the Red Line, and how often they use the artillery to shell residential buildings in Donetsk. Most of the "observers", as practice shows, strolling through the streets of cities and towns of Donbass, in the hope to find at least something slightly resembling a Russian military uniform or the number avtoznaki. 

If the whole day or take a picture of the suspect is not possible, so as not to lose workdays transmit the coordinates of its military facilities authorized for relations with the APU. Nevertheless, the republic, apparently under pressure from Russia, continues to hold the OSCE fair arbitrator. In my opinion, it's like to hold charge reyskhkantselyarii denazification Berlin. Why do we need the OSCE? Probably, to always be guilty. Perhaps this has some hidden proc. 

Not for average minds, in general. More interesting than the OSCE Council. The organization was going to cover a copper basin. America tired of monthly anti-Israeli resolutions that frequent after the political elites of the two other Western members of the Security Council, the United Kingdom and France, switched to the entire contents of the Arabian monarchies. And then the United States asked myself the question aloud, why do we need the UN? 

With English the meaning of the question was as follows: Why do we keep this dysfunctional, corrupt through and through in his office in New York and pay it with the $ 600 million a year? For officials of the "League of Nations" the question itself in danger of losing a very warm jobs, and for particularly close to the secretary-general - a bottomless trough. UN went to negotiate with the owners and the general sponsor in one person. The outcome of these negotiations is known. UN senses and of the malcontents, claiming independence, become a good little boy, tracking the movement of the finger Big Daddy. 

Anti-Israel resolutions were replaced by anti-Russian, and the once influential secretary general release to the podium only to announce the arrival of the leader of all free mankind - President of the United States. Over Russia bullied weekly. Most of the resolutions is clearly anti-Russian. If you go to heaven geopolitical our sinful earth, you should ask yourself the question - can a normal person to continue to walk in any circle / section / course, and paid, where he is constantly abused and fined? Or without that UN can not be? Is it so? Let's fantasize, with its very low bell tower. So, Russia announced the suspension of its membership in the UN. What to begin! And what will? The first day. US Permanent Representative to the widest grin voted on the establishment of a tribunal of "Boeing". Unanimously, with a couple of abstentions. Euphoria? Very short and mainly in Kiev. 

There's freedom gulped recently and have not yet departed from dizziness, supported the reduction product of the diet. Therefore, they do not know about the existence of similar cases. For example, no matter how trying the International Court in The Hague, he will not be able to attract the United States to account for the "mischief" in Serbia, Iraq, Syria and Libya. The reason is simple - America does not recognize this very Tribunal, and therefore its jurisdiction to citizens of the United States does not apply. 
Next on the scheme - if Russia is not a member of the UN, then no matter how much you may tribunals formed for the citizens of the Russian Federation, its decisions will not have legal force. Second day. US, together with unexpectedly joined them Britain and France take out a resolution of the overthrow of the Assad regime by military means. As usual, a great success, with one abstention. 

The catastrophe? It depends. Russia provides a family of Bashar al-Assad and his close supporters continue to shelter and watching the scene. After the elimination of the only enemy of fighting LIH occupies the whole territory of Syria. What's next? Advancing to the north for the IG is not real, there a strong Iran and NATO member Turkey. But on the south road is practically free. East Jordan passed a week, and here it is, Saudi Arabia - World oil storage. 

How to react to the US is not so important - oil prices soar to unprecedented heights, as well as profits of Russian oil companies. If Obama still dare to defend their oil storage, it will lead to absolutely catastrophic. The appearance of the troops the infidels at home the Prophet will cause a new influx of recruits into the ranks of the "Islamic state", so that the price of oil can not worry for the next decade. Day Three. The European delegation recalled to Brussels for urgent consultations. 

You need to have a good imagination to imagine the size of the blisters on the skin of chancellors and presidents of the tiny European education. Bear sitting, even for thin and rusty chain was free. Option barricades of missile defense systems on the Polish border passes - a bear terribly modern offensive arsenal. Not tested, yes! But who wants to check? Exit only: try to make any bilateral agreement EU - Russia, somehow proclaims the desire for peace, good neighborliness and so on.. Because the initiative comes from the EU, Russia has a field for the nomination conditions. 

For instance, non-participation in the agreement the United States as proven aggressor. The lifting of sanctions, a free trade zone, it is also (zone) security from the Atlantic to the Urals ... Finally, we go back to the UN abandoned us. Day Four. Who is sitting there so sad in the Security Council? This is China, who often provide the right of Russia to fight alone with the American hegemony, and to sit for the neutral "abstinence", so as not to make enemies, and not to damage its economy. It seems to be a friend, but only in peacetime - a sort of Belarus on a larger scale. 

China is very uncomfortable one against three. There is an option with the election of a new country instead of disposed of Russia. Applicant's: India, Japan, Germany and Brazil. Option allied unit to the first two eliminated, due to fierce territorial disputes, and even more severe economic competition. Germany falls due at the CIA kept a dossier on at least five subsequent chancellors. Brazil - is also questionable option: traditional continental solidarity with the northern neighbor and geographical remoteness from the Middle Kingdom. China may make its subsidies are on African countries to vote against the United States. But, you see, any military or economic terms, these countries do not cause trepidation among pro-American League, therefore, the effect of such a unit would be small. It is necessary to refer to the northern neighbor calling to choose: either to return to New York, with the promise to counteract shoulder to shoulder American expansion, or create a new organization in place of the discredited and, worse, obsolete Council. 

These are the "fantasy Vesnuhina." It would be naive? Probably, experts on geopolitics will in five minutes to draw a picture of the horrific consequences of breaking with the UN and the OSCE. But it is important to calculate that terrible. Slam the door and wait a couple of decades - and suddenly the situation changed: the US will choose the last honest president or all suddenly realize that further appease the aggressor can not be, or, or ... 

Anton Kopasov, engineer, writer 

Incredible Atmosphere Now in Sevastopol as Many famous people support the local Donbass

People write to us straight from the deserted Crimea: This is an incredible feeling. Incredible atmosphere Now in Sevastopol. Biker show on top. Here and visitors and support the local Donbass and gather support. Many famous people. This is the way and waiting for us, the residents of our Donetsk. Let it be a small announcement, because the bike ride to show us in the Donetsk. Has Class.
0:31
113 viewsBike Show. Victory Forge

Is this the Last chance for APU ?

Is this the Last chance for APU ?Last chance for APU

For more than a year, the Americans were preparing their Ukrainian army (APU). From different parts of the world they sent trainers and advisers. Gathered from around Europe outdated military equipment was sent. Assistance food and uniforms donated. And all for what would, when the time X comes , the APU would fulfill its main task - to have been destroyed by the Russian army. 

A long life for the APU was never expected, it was clear from the outset. This can not be a military organization, so the disregard for their relevance to their own soldiers there for a long time never was in the plan. Active military often do not have the basic necessities, forget about the wounded as soon as it becomes clear that they do not return to duty, the prisoners for the government in Kiev simply does not exist, and the demobilized are alone with their problems, with no hope of help from the authorities. Old appliances deteriorating rapidly, and the reliable substitute for morale to serve more alcoholic beverages. But all this does not matter. APU is the main force of their mass and it's unable to win. 

Under their gun are more than 230 000 people. The US plan was simple and straightforward. We must at all costs to force Russia to destroy the APU. The United States understands that so many armed forces to defeat a single blow will fail. For the victory, Russia will have to shed a lot of blood as the Russian soldiers and civilians. And even if the APU as a centralized organization will cease to exist after 2 days, it is time to give the thousands of martyrs on the altar of the "independence", and tens of thousands of potential guerrillas. 

All the resources of Russia will be linked Ukrainian conflict, and, most importantly, the wall of contradictions between the EU and Russia will be irresistible. The world outside the US will be able to dispose of the EAEC on your own. There is only one obstacle to the implementation of the plan - Russia does not want to fight. Helps neither with the daily shelling of the city of Donbass, and no periodic attempts to organize against APU a tactical offensive. 

The armed forces of New Russia (BCH) has a held strong enough that would have almost guaranteed to fight off any attacks by the APU. Any attack other than a large-scale attack with all forces and all available weapons APU. Of course, VSN can win in this case, but guarantees can not give anybody. It turns out that the only way for the APU to try to implement the things needed for which they were could have created - a full-scale offensive against the republic of New Russia was if NATO stepped in. 

And if a collision violation Minsk Agreement is solved by means of large-scale bloody provocations in which he accused the militia, the success, at least partially, their most effective offensive is still highly questionable. There are, of course, the second option - to continue provocations and wait. But APU have a shelf life. August 17 ​​ended the 6th wave of mobilization. For 2 months instead of the planned 25,000 recruits by crook managed to summon only 13 thousand. 

And in September, should be transferred to the reserve soldiers of the 3rd wave of mobilization (the most experienced and shelled). Even maintenance current population for the APU becomes a problem. As wishes to be free cannon fodder have ended. Only large-scale fighting as a delay will allow demobilization, and, thanks to martial law and the accompanying hysteria in the media, to adequately conduct the last, 7th wave mogilizatsii. If the attack does not happen until the autumn slush, it will have to be postponed until December. 

And December 2015 - the most interesting in the number of scheduled events this month: - Earn primarily energy bridge to the Crimea, Ukraine will lose one of the major levers of pressure on Russia; - enter into force on the association agreement Ukraine and EU - Russia will act against kontrsanktsii Ukraine - will be decided for a free trade agreement between the EU and the United States (TTIP), and as a consequence, the EU finally determine its position with regard to Russia; - come winter, and the specter of the collapse of the energy Ukraine is haunting power grids now; - complete term given to Minsk implementation agreements; - Ukraine will pay Russian 3 billion. Eurobond, or will default; - the economic situation in Ukraine is significantly worse than the present. Each of these items allows Russia to act more freely. In addition, by January 2016 will increase the demoralization of both MAT, and the civilian population of Ukraine. 

That said, if in January the BCH, with the support of the North Wind, undertake a large-scale attack - the US does not get half the benefits that would have been theirs, offensive VSN happen this summer. So the choice of the Americans ( namely, they make decisions for the government in Kiev) small: a great provocation and a serious offensive APU until late September or despicable, under cover of darkness, fire and wait for the city of Donbass, betting that the winter 2016 APU will still be able to resist. Good Master

Источник: http://politikus.ru/articles/56379-posledniy-shans-dlya-vsu.html
Politikus.ru

Sunday, August 16, 2015

Russian army practically invulnerable to US and NATO troops - expert

Russian army practically invulnerable to US and NATO troops - expert

Russian army practically invulnerable to US and NATO troops - expert | Russian Spring
Russia is able to keep fighting on its borders, to open several fronts in different directions and has the resources to conduct "hybrid warfare" that makes it virtually invulnerable to US army and NATO, says the founder of the blog war theme Foxtrot Alpha Tyler Rogouey.
"We (the US - approx. Ed.) Understand that faced with logistical difficulties in Eastern Europe.For example, Eastern European railways different gauge than in Western Europe, so the delivery of supplies is becoming more difficult to process ", - quotes the American columnist General Ray Odierno. 
According to analysts, the country is the fact that the Pentagon learned about it just now, given that the various departments of the US military action in Europe for the past 75 years.
General Odierno also said that only 33% of the US Army combat brigades ready for confrontation with Russia, while for such an operation requires a minimum of 60% - the level of readiness, which the US military will be able to achieve in the best case to the end of the decade.
Thus, during the Cold War in Europe was 250 thousand US soldiers, now their number has decreased to only 31 thousand - contingent, equivalent volume deployment of US troops in South Korea.
Tyler Rogouey believes that "tabletop war games" - maneuvers where there is no direct confrontation, but decisions are made on the number of troops, their combat readiness and capability - could be the next Pentagon lobbying campaign to increase military spending.
Nevertheless, the results obtained in the course of such operations, indicate the possibility of the US military in a potential conflict with Russia.
"The sad truth is that America can spend $ 600 billion a year on defense, and thus there is no certainty that a conventional conflict with Russia will end in favor of the United States," - adds a browser.

Pushilin Denis: If Ukraine makes an attempt to take an offensive, our response will be appropriate

Denis Pushilin: We are ready to attack and the transition to the offensive

What is it to smile every day the enemy? To hide the pain of loss from prying eyes. Talking about statistics, seeing each letter of the blood of friends and the ruin of their country. To bear arms was not the most difficult for Denis Pushilin.

Day after day, month after month, he sits down at the negotiating table with parliament of the enemy. The enemy is cruel, inhuman, deprived of their own will. An enemy who hates us more and for the fact that we are free. The junta has always hated us free. Therefore, the junta hates New Russia. 

On the complexity of the negotiation process of Donetsk and Kiev in terms of actual war, said Special Representative DNI Dennis Pushilin browser "PolitNavigator" Valentin Filippov. 

Valentin Filippov: Hello, Denis! Unfortunately, people have ceased to believe the media, myself included. I finally realized that until you're in place, you do not understand. 
Not what is happening in Minsk, nor what happens in Donetsk. And you may even be lucky in life. You and there and there. And there, and there have information. Tell me that's the format of Minsk. What's going on there? Who are these people and whether they understand that Donbass is now under fire, and that they are responsible for it? 

Pushilin Denis: Good afternoon. I would like to start by saying that the Minsk process, in general, quite complex. And the negotiation process is quite complicated. There will need to maintain an adequate level of diplomacy and not to get personal, do not pass on the emotions and really easy to talk with a cool head. Be aware, in the sense that now there is such a number of victims, but if we come to an aggravation, it will amount to a completely different numbers. We, unfortunately, remember, we were supposed to learn the lessons of the Great Patriotic War, when victims numbered in the millions. 
 
And to think that it is not possible now, or our actions did not lead to this, probably, it would not be right. Here, direct the discussion and the number of victims of the shelling - this is how statistics. Normal sane person, of course, I would like to resort to some actions that are unacceptable in diplomatic circles. But, unfortunately, to find a consensus to find a compromise and a compromise solution - a solution that is not fully satisfied with any of the parties, that the search for such decisions and must be engaged in the Minsk format. 

The search for such solutions should engage in any negotiating body. Of course, if put to the negotiating table the man who had just lost a relative during the shelling of Gorlovka, for example. On the other hand, put the widow Ukrainian soldier, who was killed on the outskirts or along the line of contact .. 

Valentin Filippov: but he's an occupier ... 

Denis Pushilin: They did not agree to that. Agree though. The maximum that they can, at each other's hair, but no consensus is found. So here it is to turn off the emotions. I can not speak for themselves. I completely turn off the emotions. For a long time I switch off. Because I just lost and relatives, and a lot of friends, associates, colleagues, who were next to me, and I still try not to think that they never will. Because of that you can go crazy. From this can be switched off from the process ... and then they die, their death is simply wasted. 

Valentin Filippov: In general, everything is clear. But the people what they want ... I do not understand the situation. If agreement seems to be about some agreements. They achieved. There was talk of a ceasefire. In general, the Ukrainian side, it does not manage the process? Or realized? What prevents a cease-fire? 

Pushilin Denis: It is much more complicated. In Ukraine today there is no acceptable alternative that would have made ​​full ... options for further development. We are well aware that memory is simply to turn off the relatives of those killed and thousands of participants in these processes - will fail. We can not say, "Well, all the guys. From today we have a truce. Let's pretend that we have nothing happened. And yet, it was. " But this option is generally excluded. what options remain? Whether to accept that there is a DNR and LC. But in what terms to accept? Well, let's say, there are also a variety of scenarios. There are scenarios that we can observe from the world practice. Even let's not far to walk. There is an understanding, when Georgia with South Ossetia and Abkhazia when closed, in general, all sorts of social and economic ties, overlapping the edges, that is, as if they do not exist. 

And the other scenario. Moldova and Transnistria. There's plenty of close cooperation even after the armed conflict. This is how Kiev should act correctly? For Kiev and the painful, and painfully. For example, if only overlap from us, not at all it turns out, because not much raising another subject of economic cooperation, there is coal. Coal Ukraine needs in order to provide heat during the heating season. If you take the Transnistrian option, for Ukraine as it is unacceptable, because the "war party" or "party of Maidan", they do not accept. They take the position that you need to clean up the Donbass, destroy by means of the armed forces of Ukraine. Bad option.So we can go back again .... Gorbulin, someone who is a party to the negotiation process with the Ukrainian side, that he wrote five scenarios, five options for further developments. 

The fifth option, which he pushed it the option of "no war, no peace."That is, with periodic or permanent negotiations, despite the fact that there is a demotivatsionnaya activities. That's just the attacks that we have seen, they do not lead to a full-fledged Ukrainian offensive force, they are actually demotivator for the population, which is forced to endure. And the population perceives it is not just painful ... are killed and injured every day by our citizens. 

Valentin Filippov: Well, the point of such a demotivating? What does it lead? 

Pushilin Denis: It's undermining from within. That is, an attempt to prolong the time of Ukraine, trying to, say, the hope that Russia will conceive of sanctions by the European Union, Russia is economically exhausted, not even humanitarian support Donbass. Inside obtained discourages the time that people are tired of living under fire ... 

Valentin Filippov: tired, but they hate there. Well, Russia has weakened. Well, it was not Russian. Well, that was not it tomorrow! No Donbass does not help. But people somehow hate the Ukraine thanks to fire. I am now in the Crimea there to hear "Yes, there is! Yes, it's all a lie, Ukraine is good, it should be friends! ". So you were there at all? - "Yes, I in 2011 went to Kherson! There Kherson Crimea exactly the same as it is here! And is not there any Bandera, I checked! ". So. If residents of the Donbass would not suffer from the attacks, regularly, but felt that there's pensions paid something else. It would somehow then moved toward each other. And now - in just a few generations.

Pushilin Denis: That you're right. Ukraine is not aware of one. With his firing, his actions discourages adjusts not only against us, against the authorities, which is here, but against yourself. People are well aware of where the shells fly. Who destroys them.Who will cripple their relatives who destroy the infrastructure and who makes life miserable. And yet here we consider the economic blockade, which is also feeling the ... Plus, it's the wrong option because Ukraine to alienate people and the second option is that Russia has a margin of safety is much more serious than those of the EU. 

The EU is also aware, but succumbed to pressure from the United States that the only ones who benefit from this conflict. Who wins and economically ... from this state poluvoyny and in the political arena. They have created another point of conflict is unfortunately not unique. And Syria, Yemen and there. And a number of other countries. Which, thanks to the US is drowning in blood. But as far as understanding the Ukrainian state - this is the second question. Because it is operated in the same way. 

Curators. Outside. That is, Ukraine is not independent in its decisions.Unfortunately, we fix it in a number of cases in the negotiations. We agreed everything perfectly. Dot all over the place. However, the next call to Kiev or somewhere further, as we assume absolutely must have reasoned, and the whole situation is not on the rolls. That's just such conditions it is necessary to negotiate.

Valentin Filippov: But I'm always trying to bring you one answer. So you've personally you think: shelling - this conscious action, is not making the average commanders of the armed forces of Ukraine? It is, after all, such a policy? So this is - nightly focused ... I mean, it does not indulge? 

Denis Pushilin: Absolutely not indulge. Absolutely purposeful policy. Moreover, with some clear plan. This was confirmed even become a direct participant of the negotiation process Gorbulina that is all clearly described and even pushed, so to say, public opinion to this option. There is absolutely clear that they will continue and some time to act. And this creates the hope at the moment in the format already, "Norman," which will put enough pressure. 

But there is, of course, a lot of objections - "why should we participate, why do we need it?" I want to tell you that for us it is It is a very important international platform when we hear that understand these issues. Because I'm here, for example, knowing the tragedy, the tragedy of feeling everything that's going on here, but very mediocre, very indirectly, to delve into what is happening in Syria. 

Although this conflict is very closely related.Here in Syria - there are now literally die there every day hundreds of thousands of people. And that is just the world community is silent and does not know about it. And the fact that all these conflicts are linked - has shown, perhaps, the statement Kerry when he prescribed conditions when they come out of the negotiation process in Ukraine, if the situation will not be resolved with Iran. 

That is, all that is happening in Iran, no matter how far away it seemed to us, it is very closely linked to what is happening with us. Yes, this is what was announced. Now imagine how much is not sounded from fields various meetings, summits and various other things that simply are not submitted to the Public, but remains at the level of those responsible for a particular part of the negotiation process . 

Valentin Filippov: I see. You are in Minsk you Donetsk, you can see with your own eyes. Words to fight - it's good, but, as they say, a good word longer valid when a grenade launcher in his hands. At the end of winter - the beginning of March, Alexander Zakharchenko said the increase in the militia, about such plans. Then, like saying that there are 35-36 thousand, promised that there will be 120 thousand. I understand that there is a military secret. But what happens to the host? That is, build up strength? Whether increasing the combat capability? Does the size of the increases, the technical equipment? Is the army of New Russia, the DNI to fight? 

Pushilin Denis: I want to tell you that even the militia already it would be wrong to call it. 

Valentin Filippov: Well, a beautiful word. Well, beautiful. 

Pushilin Denis: I mean, composition, quality, say so. 

Valentin Filippov: People's Army. 

Denis Pushilin: Militia I still associate with the period when people are absolutely chaotic, feeling responsible for their land for his people, took up arms and, having no experience, without having any combat coordination, were protected, so to speak, from the occupation of our land. But then it was extremely chaotic, that is, it was impossible to speak about any unity of command, given that this is really a popular uprising, given that it was organized by the various points. That is, it looks very messy. 

However, it gave the result. And that, say, the greatest achievement of all children, then who did it, who did not hesitate, and, moreover, who put it over my life and my health. Today, we already have a full-fledged army. That is, it is an army with combat training, an army shooting, PhD, is an army with the updated, let's say, the technique because Debaltsevsky Ilovajskij and boilers, so to speak, are paying off in terms of replenishing our technical support. 

Accordingly, training, which is conducted at our various ranges, and various command staff as well. That is, if it is a tanker, it's really a tanker that can already. It is not a tractor because there is an analogy for managing tank and tractor. Here it is, so to speak, was forced to fight on the tank.Now - a completely different level. Accordingly, we are absolutely ready to repel an attack, if such be followed by the Armed Forces of Ukraine. 

Valentin Filippov: A to attack? 

Pushilin Denis: To approach - we are ready to attack from the side and move to the offensive. 

Valentin Filippov: diplomacy. Let Lavrov worried. Lavrov's time to worry. Young changed. 

Pushilin Denis: Actually, for us it is very important now to do everything possible in the political arena and not to provoke the conflict itself, because we are well aware, we value every human life. No matter: on the side or on that side. It is impossible to such a conflict solution by military means, to people dying from only one side. There are dead and there and there. And of those, and those have relatives.

What will be more victims, the relatives will be more unhappy that it will pass from generation to generation. That is, as you rightly said at the beginning of the transmission, the conflict can be smoothed, so to speak, we will be able to communicate more or less normally in only a few generations, at least two generations. Here's a period of time, now here this reserve has already made ​​the conflict so far. If the situation escalates, the situation may be much more pitiable.

Valentin Filippov: On the one hand, yes, but I like Odessa, always remember how fellow weekly fall into the dungeons and do not go there. And there are losing health.Someone killed. You probably know how much Odessites war. ... Still in the army, I will call. Because, in the end, no matter what the discipline was not there, people come to volunteer for the most part. And even some do not take. They say: "you are fat, you can not run." Some, by the way, veterans of militia is very upset that they take away from the front, sent to some logistical service. They say: "You do not physically pull."He says: "How not to pull? Dill I want to mow. " He says, "No, you will shift the paper or in the kitchen, because the old you." That is, the competition is real. Therefore, this militia is the People's Army. With discipline, but the People. 

Pushilin Denis: That the People's Army, I do not argue here. I will express our position. For me, due to the fact the militia guys who climbed erratically, had no form, in jeans and fought with weapons that the battlefield away. Who do I call it a host of very difficult. However, we have adopted the Law "On the status of volunteer", that is, for us is very important.We do not charge you in any time, do not have this or any moral right, any more. Well, as for the children, who are now being held hostage, in fact. And not necessarily in the dungeons. 

That is, even the man on the loose, he can not make his position any, nor to express their opinions openly, whether it is in Odessa, Kharkov and other cities, our towns, in fact. It's very sad. And our next task, of course, they are free. What option - will probably time. We do our best, that it was a political scenario. But, unfortunately, we do not rule out a military solution to the conflict. Because if we will be applied against the forces if Ukraine did make an attempt to take the offensive, and so, of course, our response will be appropriate. 

But, I would say, and I would like to perhaps warn. Care of himself, activists who are involved. They are quite a lot everywhere.That is dissatisfied with the territory of Ukraine is growing, and people are tired of war.