Monday, July 21, 2014

Before we can have Law, we must have a Community of Common Concern.

 Before we can have Law, we must have a Community of Common Concern.

 7-21-2014
Since World War II, the primary ambition of international humanitarian law — the law of armed conflict — has been to insulate military violence from the civilian population as is mandated in International Law. As such, military forces are required to identify themselves as , by wearing clearly marked uniforms, and to discriminate in their selection of targets: They cannot deliberately attack noncombatants or infrastructure that has no military use. Even with respect to legitimate targets, the attacker must exercise proportionality: Any collateral damage to noncombatants must be proportional to the military value of the target. Because this is “the law,” it is easy for observers — not to speak of partisans — to express their shock when noncombatants, including children, die. We find quick recourse to the discourse of “war crimes.” We hear demands for tribunals, as if the legality of these situations can be separated from their politics.

 Recent events in Ukraine remind us of what actually happens when opposing politics turns violent: Noncombatants are injured and killed. The laws of warfare have never worked very well. Violence is never exact and tends to get out of hand; mistakes are made and vengeance is sought. Collateral damage can be horrendous, even within the boundaries of law. Even when care is exercised, a mistaken identification can mean hospitals, homes, vehicles or even airplanes are hit. Ironically, the more exact violence becomes, the less effective it may prove to be. Causing a lot of property damage is not going to resolve any deep conflict.

 Measured against the laws of war, virtually the entire Ukrainian military would be illegal. Ukraine has a vast inventory of weapons incapable of discriminating between combatants and noncombatants. Its military operatives do not bear their arms openly and they do not identify themselves in order clearly to distinguish themselves from noncombatants. If they were to have to comply with the law, they would have no means of effectively deploying violence against the Seperatist forces. The rules of warfare were obviously not written with an eye to violent conflict between State and Anti-state forces. They were, for that reason, never effective in controlling the violence of population cleansing.

 The asymmetry in forces, both in size and sophistication, makes it impossible to impose symmetrical legal obligations to both sides. In situations of extreme asymmetry, a new measure of proportionality enters the ethical calculus: a proportionality of overall injury. The indiscriminate character of the Ukrainian bombings is, in this view, not a measure of their illegality, but of the morality of their potential effectiveness in inflicting a proportionate injury. 

Asymmetry leads to one sort of failure of law; symmetry in ultimate concerns leads to another. Humanitarian law has never been capable of dealing with conflicts over national survival. One visible demonstration of this is the maintenance of nuclear weapons. These weapons cannot discriminate and are completely disproportionate to any ordinary political end. They are for that reason “illegal,” but that judgment completely misses their political point of announcing the ultimate value of national existence — a value so great as to threaten the very continuation of life on earth.

 This is why there is no possible solution to the Ukrainian conflict through violence — short of apocalyptic violence on one side or the other. Both sides see an ultimate value at stake. Situations of reciprocal, violent sacrifice cannot be managed by recourse to law, but only by a balance of terror. Thus, the Ukraine Army resorts to fight outside the law, and know that their most effective weapon is “collateral damage & fear.” The Separatist, on the other hand, try to bring a reciprocal threat of violence directly to the Ukrainian forces. Neither side, however, can allow that balance to get completely out of control, without risking everything.

Just as law cannot create a community among people who view each other as enemies, it cannot hold together a community once the bonds of political friendship fail. When communities pursue a violent course of secession, their disputes are not settled by law or even within the law. Indeed, secession marks the failure of law. The law cannot tell us which people should be states or where to draw the boundaries between states. The coming together and the coming apart of states demand more than law can offer. When such a conflict turns violent, as it has in the Ukraine, we must hope that we can trust the judgment of politicians, for the law has nothing useful to say.

About the Author:
Paul W. Kahn is Robert W. Winner Professor of Law and the Humanities and director of the Orville H. Schell, Jr. Center for International Human Rights at Yale Law School.

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Spanish Air Controller @ Kiev Borispol Airport: Ukraine Military Shot Down Boeing #MH17

Spanish Air Controller @ Kiev Borispol Airport: Ukraine Military Shot Down Boeing #MH17 

 (Slavyangrad, July 20, 2014):
FLASH UPDATEIndustry Outlet Confirms Carlos (@spainbuca) as ATC at Borispol in Kiev
(See the text of Carlos / @spainbuca Tweets below the following article)
- Ukraine air traffic controller suggests Kiev military shot down passenger plane (ETN Global Travel Industry News, July 17, 2014):
ETN received information from an air traffic controller in Kiev on Malaysia Airlines flight MH17.
This Kiev air traffic controller is a citizen of Spain and was working in the Ukraine. He was taken off duty as a civil air-traffic controller along with other foreigners immediately after a Malaysia Airlines passenger aircraft was shot down over the Eastern Ukraine killing 295 passengers and crew on board.
The air traffic controller suggested in a private evaluation and basing it on military sources in Kiev, that the Ukrainian military was behind this shoot down. Radar records were immediately confiscated after it became clear a passenger jet was shot down.
Military air traffic controllers in internal communication acknowledged the military was involved, and some military chatter said they did not know where the order to shoot down the plane originated from.
Obviously it happened after a series of errors, since the very same plane was escorted by two Ukrainian fighter jets until 3 minutes before it disappeared from radar.
Radar screen shots also show an unexplained change of course of the Malaysian Boeing. The change of course took the aircraft directly over the Eastern Ukraine conflict region.
Some tweets received suggest this may have been a secret military uprising against the current Ukrainian president under the direction of formerly-jailed Prime Minister Timoshenko.
According to other rumors, the black box for this crashed Malaysian Airlines flight was taken by Donetsk separatists. A spokesperson for the rebel group said this black box would be sent to the Interstate Aviation Committee headquartered in Moscow.
The First Deputy Prime Minister of the self-proclaimed People’s Republic of Donetsk, Andrew Purgin, stated that the flight recorders of the crashed aircraft will be transferred to Moscow for examination.
Sources say the Rebel group leadership hopes this would confirm the Ukrainian military actually shot down this aircraft. This was reported by the news agency Interfax-Ukraine.
ETN statement: The information in this article is independently confirmed and based on the statement of one airline controller and other tweets received.

Translated from Spanish by Luis Lopez
Source: Tweets by Spanish Air Controller - @spainbuca

CHRONOLOGY OF @spainbuca’s TWITTER FEED
10:21 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Autoridades de kiev, intentan hacer que pueda parecer un ataque de los pro-rusos
“Kiev Authorities, trying to make looks like an attack by pro-Russian”
10:24 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Ojo! Que puede ser un derribo B777 Malaysia Airlines en ukraine, 280 pasajeros
“warning! It can be a downing, Malaysia Airlines B777 in ukraine, 280 passengers”
10:25 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Cuidado! Kiev tiene lo que buscaba
“Warning! Kiev have what they wanted”
10:25 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Vuelven a tomar la torre de control en Kiev
“[Miitary] has taken control of ATC in Kiev”
10:27 – 17 de jul. de 2014 El avión B777 de Malaysia Airlines desapareció del radar, no hubo comunicación de ninguna anomalia, confirmado
“The Malaysia Airlines B777 plane disappeared from the radar, there was no communication of any anomaly, confirmed”
10:30 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Avión derribado, derribados, derribado no accidente
“Plane shot down, shot down, shot down, no accident”
10:31 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Kiev, tiene lo que buscaba, lo dije en los primeros tw, kiev es responsable @ActualidadRT
“Kiev have what they wanted, I said in the first tw [Tweets], Kiev is responsible @ ActualidadRT”
10:35 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Un accidente muy normal no es, no están amenazando en la misma torre del aeropuerto de kiev,
“An accident that is not quite normal, they are threatening us in the same tower of Kiev airport”
10:35 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Nos van a quitar, nuestros tlf y demás de un momento a otro
“they will take from our phones and others stuff at any moment”
10:38 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Antes de que me quiten el tlf o me rompan la cabeza, derribado por Kiev
“Before They remove my phone or they break my head, shot down by Kiev”
11:12 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Nosotros tenemos la confirmación. Avión derribado, la autoridad de kiev, ya tiene la información, derribado, estamos tranquilos ahora
“We have confirmation. Plane downed, Kiev authorities already have the information, downed, we are calm now”
11:13 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Que hace personal extranjero con autoridades de kiev en la torre? Recopilando toda la información
“What are doing foreigners with kiev authorities in the tower? Gathering all the information”
11:15 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Cuando sea posible sigo escribiendo
“When possible I´ll keep writing”
11:48 – 17 de jul. de 2014 El avión B 777 voló escoltado por 2 cazas de ukraine hasta minutos antes, de desaparecer de los radares,
The B777 plane flew escorted by Ukraine jet fighter until 2 minutes before disappearing from the radar,
11:54 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Sí las autoridades de kiev, quieren decir la verdad, esta recogido 2 cazas volaron muy cerca minutos antes , no lo derribo un caza
“If kiev authorities want to tell the truth, It´s gathered, 2 jet fighters flew very close minutes before, wasn’t downed by a fighter”
12:00 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Nada más desaparecer el avión B 777 de Malaysia Airlines la autoridad militar de kiev nos informo del derribo, como lo sabían?
“Malaysia Airlines B777 plane just disappeared and Kiev military authority informed us of the downing, How they knew?”
12:00 – 17 de jul. de 2014 A los 7:00 minutos se notificó el derribo, más tarde se tomó la torre nuestra con personal extranjero q siguen aquí
“7:00 minutes after [plane dissapeared], the downing was notified, later our tower was taken with foreigner staff, they still here ”
12:01 – 17 de jul. de 2014 En los radares esta todo recogido, para los incrédulos, derribado por kiev, aquí lo sabemos y control aéreo militar también
“all this is gathered in radars, to the unbelieving, shot down by kiev, here we know it and military air traffic control also”
13:15 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Aquí los mandos militares manejan y admiten que militares a otras órdenes, pudieron ser, pero no, los pro-rusos
“Here the military commanders manage and support it could be military following other orders , but no, the pro-Russian”
13:29 – 17 de jul. de 2014 El ministro del interior si conocía que, hacían los cazas en la zona, el ministro de defensa no, .
“Interior Minister knew what the fighters were doing in the area, the defense minister didn’t.”
13:31 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Militares confirman que fue ukraine, pero se sigue sin saber de donde vino la orden
“Military confirm It was Ukraine, but still does not know where the order came from”
13:36 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Hace dias lo dije aquí, militares de kiev querían alzarse contra el actual presidente, esto puede ser una forma, a las órdenes de timoshenko
“Days ago I said here, kiev military wanted to rise against the current president, this may be a way, ordered by timoshenko [following timishenko orders]”
13:38 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Los cazas volaron cerca del 777, hasta 3 minutos antes de desaparecer de los radares, solo 3 minutos
“The fighters flew close to 777, up to 3 minutes before disappearing from the radar, just 3 minutes”
13:43 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Se cierra el espacio aéreo
“Airspace closed”
13:45 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Se cierra el espacio aéreo, por miedo a más derribos
“Airspace is closed, more downings feared”
15:17 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Control militar entrega ahora mismo de forma oficial que el avión fue derribado por misil
“military control now officially [say] the plane was shot down by missile”
15:23 – 17 de jul. de 2014 El informe oficial firmado por las autoridades militares de control de kiev ya lo tiene el gobierno,,,, , derribado
“Government has the official report signed by the control military authorities in Kiev,,,, [plane] shot down”
15:26 – 17 de jul. de 2014 En el informe se indica de donde abría salido el misil, y se especifica que no proviene de las autodefensa en las zonas rebeldes
“The report indicates where the missile had come out [from], and specified is not from the selfdefence in rebel areas”
15:34 – 17 de jul. de 2014Los radares militares si recogieron los datos del misil lanzado al avión, los radares civiles no
“Military radar collected data from missile fired to the plane, civilian radars didn’t”
15:36 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Los altos mandos militares no ordenaron el lanzamiento del misil, ,,alguien se le fue la mano en nombre de ukraine
“military high command did not gave the order to fire the missile, someone screw it ine the name of ukraine”
15:38 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Para el que no lo sepa, digamos así, hay militares a las órdenes del ministro de defensa y militares a las órdenes del ministro del interior
“For those who do not know, Let’s say, there are military under the orders of the defense minister and military under the orders of Interior Minister”
15:38 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Los militares a las órdenes del ministro del interior conocían en cada momento lo que sucedió, .
“The military under the orders of Interior Minister knew what happened all the time .”
16:06 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Mandos militares aquí (ATC) torre de control, confirman que el misil es del ejercito de ukraine,
“Military commanders here (ATC) control tower, confirm that the missile is from the ukranian army,”
16:07 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Mandos militares que si lo sabían y otros mandos que no,
“military commanders that knew it and others didn´t ,”
16:08 – 17 de jul. de 2014 290 personas inocentes muertas, . Por una guerra inútil, donde el patriotismo se compra con dinero
“290 dead innocent people. What a useless war, where patriotism is bought with money”
16:09 – 17 de jul. de 2014 La forma de tomar la torre de control minutos después sabiendo todo los detalles, rápido nos hizo pensar que habían sido ellos
“Thw way the control tower was taken minutes after & knowing all the details, made ​​us think that they [made it]”
16:10 – 17 de jul. de 2014 La cara de los militares que llegaron más tarde diciendo pero que habéis echo, no dejo dudas
“The face of the soldiers who came later saying [what you just did], no chance for doubts”
16:12 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Es tal la decadencia que los militares acompañados de extranjeros que llegaron primero nos llegaron a pedir que dijéramos su versión
“Such is the decline that military who came first accompanied by foreigners came to us asking us to tell their version”
16:13 – 17 de jul. de 2014 Nuestra respuesta, fue, estos radares no recogen el lanzamiento de misiles, los militares si, ya no quedaban dudas
“Our response was, these radars do not collect the launching of missiles, the military ones does, there were no doubts”
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, July 12, 2014

Kagan’s Neo-Conservative Manifesto / A world order is imposed by superior power.

The Mindlessness of a Manifesto
“A world order is imposed by superior power.”

By William A Cook

“A liberal world order, like any world order, is something that is imposed, and as much as we in the West might wish it to be imposed by superior virtue, it is generally imposed by superior power” (“Superpowers Don’t Get to Retire: What Our Tired Country Still Owes the World,” Robert Kagan, Brookings Institute. May 26, 2014).
July 12, 2014 "ICH" -  This sentence from Kagan’s Neo-Conservative Manifesto reads like so much flotsam in a cesspool of scattered feces. It emanates from a mindless, bloated root chakra that has abandoned all except instinctive self-survival. It is deficient in understanding and wisdom, a mind surviving in an isolated tribe, a being guided only by fear of everlasting victimhood. How does one read this flotsam?
We don’t need to read it, we are witnessing its last throes today in Gaza as the consequences of neo-conservative “superior power” unfurls before the world once again and the desperation of neo-conservative idiocy splashes over the screen for the world to witness.
What is it that we witness? Israel garbed in the armor of the American flag, fielding America’s weapons of mass destruction, protected by the investment of the American taxpayer in the “iron dome,” and marching with the impunity that comes from America’s veto of censure, reveals to the world two nations that willingly impose their “superior power” on a defenseless people displaying in the enormity of their invasion unleashed evil without compassion, without mercy, without sense, a mindless act of uncivil barbarity no different than that displayed by the Mongols or Visigoths of ancient days.
Kagan’s is a simple sentence, “A world order is imposed by superior power.” It does not advance by justice, it mocks justice; it does not consider morality, it laughs at morality; it does not reflect rights of people anywhere, just its rights; it is the rule of those who can and who do not care to care for any but self; it is ruled by a pathological fear engendered by victimhood because they know their own power rests on the destruction of others and hence on the fear that they will infect their victims with the same loathsome mentality that guides them. What is a “liberal” world order if its actions abandon all human capacity to seek justice in favor of “power,” to rule without inclusiveness of those ruled, to slaughter without civilized due process? What is it but barbarianism. Why consider “superior virtue” when it only obstructs conquest? Besides, whose “superior virtue” are we to follow? Why get embroiled in arguments; power alone is the determiner of virtue. It’s all so easy, so sensible at least to the few who impose their will.
Today’s invasion of Gaza is but a repetition of Israel’s savagery under Sharon and Olmert; I’ve written about this before. How horrible that we must revisit such horror! All I can do is to reassert what was true in Rafah, Jenin, Lebanon, Syria, and Palestine again and again and again since 1947 and ’48.
“Evil knows no morality; it savors no regard for the weak or oppressed; it admits no rights but those it imposes; it condemns those who dissent without regard for evidence or truth; it denies all wrongdoing since its actions alone determine right; it feels no shame; it accepts no blame; it pleads innocence, seeks to cloak itself in the victim’s stripes, and curses those who condemn its crimes.
Franz Kafka presented a vicious portrayal of such a country in “The Penal Colony.” Considered as a metaphor for Israel today, ironically since Kafka wrote from the vantage point of being a Jew, the “Officer” and executioner delighted in describing the virtues of his state’s torture machine as it inscribed on the victim’s skin his crime, and in the duration of its agonizing process the victim learned what he was guilty of, though, until that moment of recognition as the steel spikes carved his sentence on his back, he had never been charged with a crime. Kafka knew the consequences of being a Jew in a world without compassion (even before the state of Israel declared its “independence.” )
Thus it is in today’s Israel; the state, in the figure of its Prime Ministers, determines what is right, what is a crime, and who is guilty; there is no need for due rights whether of an individual or a state like (Lebanon) or the people of Palestine. Israel alone determines what terrorism is, it alone defies international law and the UN resolutions with impunity, it alone chooses the words that will describe its actions determining for the world community how it is to understand Israel’s actions. And so it is in the Penal Colony. All live in fear of the executioner, both the colonists and the occupied. So long as that fear can be maintained, so long can the Colony survive under its brutal regime. But time catches up with the Penal Colony. An outsider is brought in to witness how it operates and how it executes its “civilized” approach to management of the colony. The witness listens to the detailed explanation of the Officer as he justifies the policies and procedures of the Penal Colony, but he marks the Medieval and barbaric reality of the colony and its treatment of its citizens and those it condemns to execution. (Today we are the outsider who witnesses the executioner at work).
Kafka notes with remarkable insight and wisdom that the state will not change until it accepts its own guilt, until it comprehends that its behavior rests on principles that are corrosive to human kind, blind to the reality of human equality, and self-destructive because built on superstition and fear. Once that recognition comes, the Officer and executioner mounts the torture machine and straps himself in its bed. And as the machine begins to run, the witness watches the spikes inscribe the sentence on his back, “Be Just.”
Evil exists in the delusion that grows from ignorance and alienation, necessary ingredients in a state of “demonocracy.” Peace is possible when openness proliferates and people remove the barriers that isolate and separate them from each other” (Cook, “Desire, Fulfillment and Regret, 2006.” Decade of Deceit).
Will we ever learn from the past? Will Kagan ever grasp that he speaks only to his own, the exclusive fraternity that can for a time impose what it will as it destroys families across the mid-east in the Neo-Conservative design to redraw the ground on which they walk and live? Will they ever understand the intensity of grief that comes from such a mindset devoid of human sympathy for those who huddle behind walls as the missiles fall? Perhaps Conrad’s unembellished prose tells it simply without gloss, just straight forward truth:
“They were conquerors, and for that you want only brute force nothing to boast of, when you have it, since your strength is just an accident arising from the weakness of others. They grabbed what they could get for the sake of what was to be got. It was just robbery with violence, aggravated murder on a great scale, and men going at it blind as it is very proper for those who tackle the darkness. The conquest of the earth, which mostly means taking it away from those who have a different complexion or slightly flatter noses than ourselves (or hide in a self declared grouping ‘we in the West’), is not a pretty thing when you look at it too much…”
Today it is the Neo-Cons as conquerors, mostly Ashkenazi Jews from the ancient Khazar empire whose nobility converted to Judaism in the 800s, who find solace in survival at the expense of others, a motivation nourished in the root chakra that thrives on instinct embedded in possessiveness, devoid of the chakras that seek communion with the whole being and accommodation of all in a shared universe. It is but a matter of time before their strength diminishes and the strength of others conquerors them.
Where is the proffered peace promised 65 years ago when the state of Israel declared its independence? Where is the touted democracy, the only true democracy in the mid-east that resorts to “superior power” to control the people of Palestine whose land they have stolen? Where is the obligation to abide by international law signed before the world in its acceptance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the conventions of the Unite Nations?
What then does the word “liberal” mean?
William A. Cook, Ph.D., is a professor of English at the University of La Verne.


Friday, July 4, 2014

No Cancer Foundation (NCF Whistleblowers)

No Cancer Foundation (NCF Whistleblowers)
 
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1gv6Uq9vhDxz7vd9FKAA2Q/videos
      

Life is not about how hard you hit, it's about how hard you can get hit and keep moving  forward. 

W them they came for the  Jews,  Gypsies and  Serbs  I did not speak up, because i was a one of each .
When they came for the Muslims and Catholics, I did not speak up because i was  none of them. 
And, when they came for me, there was no one left to speak up!!

It's " NOW or NEVER "!!
No Cancer Foundation is a humanitarian organization That fight international "for" human rights, "against" industrial mass poisoning, cancer and other diseases poisoning. This foundation Represented all global citizens, and Provides a Platform for All Those who want positive change by giving a strong signal to 'responsible officials, to providence a bridge between Governments and citizens to work with the prospect of a joint democratic solutions for all parties.

YouTube video


This organization private design to build a bridge between government and citizens to providence Jointly democratic solutions for all parties. Violations of laws and regulations Should Be Addressed directly, So THAT injustice, discrimination and current stealth killer mass poisoning at high profits, depopulation Agenda 21 under the guise of sustainability and innovation belong to the past, and human rights are Respected again. "Every public officer or officer in the performance of his duties who has knowledge of a crime or misdemeanor, is obliged to inform the prosecutor immediately.

Belgian Federal Government 

https://sites.google.com/site/ncfwhistleblower/memorandum-van-koning-leopold-iii

For this reason we (the People) request the  Belgian federal government  to decide tat in accor dance with the  Belgian Constitution , still need to be given implementation to the on January 25, 1944 by King Leopold III completed " Political Testament "such as the Constitution demands . Based on the followin facts: 

Formal petition of January 31, 2013  with ( acknowledgment ) to the Belgian Federal Government with supplementary  formal petition of 19 April 2013  ( acknowledgment ).
Each Member of Parliament and Senator must take an oath, in one of the three official languages. That oath reads:
I swear to observe the Constitution.
I swear to observe the Constitution.
You jure d'observer la Constitution.
Ich schwöre who Verfassung zu reck.
The search for the truth begins here,  listen to everyone, read everything, believe nothing, "unless" you can prove by own research, then, 
Kings and Queens
https://sites.google.com/site/nocancerfoundation/nazi-netherlands
- See our formal letter from  February 26, 2014  to His Royal Highness King Philippe I of Belgium.
 See our formal letter from  February 11, 2014  to Queen Maxima of the Netherlands;
- See our formal letter from  May 27, 2012  (English)  to Princess Maxima of the Netherlands;
- See our formal letter from  May 27, 2012  (English) to His Royal Highness King Albert II of Belgium;
European Parliament

- See our formal letter from  May 27, 2012  (English) to Herman Rumpuy President of Europe;

United Nations


- See our formal petition of April 22, 2013 (English) to the United Nations (UN)    
Involved and universities for support in stopping the current or Nazi collaboration and depopulation " Agenda 21 "( registered  and sent by e-mail).
North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
https://sites.google.com/site/ncfnocancerfoundation/anders-fogh-rasmussen-opperbevelhebber-van-de-navo-speelt-onverminderd-de-zwarte-piet-door-aan-rusland-op-alle-fronten
Formal petition of October 20, 2011 (English) to Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Supreme Commander of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) video  and formal request of June 26, 2014 to stop stealth murderous chemical genocide.
European Commission 
https://sites.google.com/site/ncfwhistleblowers/home/barroso-gloomy.jpg
Formal petition of October 20, 2011 (English) to José Manuel Barroso President of the European Commission video  with formal juridical substantiated request for stopping stealth murderous mass poisoning. 
European Court of Justice
Formal petition of July 21, 2011 to the Court of Justice of the European Union against the State of the Netherlands, with additional formal letter of August 8, 2011 to the Court of the European Union Attn. judicial clerk Emmanuel Coulon Rue du Fort Niedergrünewald, L-2925 Luxembourg.
It's Time That citizens get informed!
https://sites.google.com/site/nocancerfoundation/educate-yourself
NCF  Whistleblowers  apologizes for the by You-Tube  deleted  juridical underpinning  videos

Concerning videos  on the NCF Whistleblower You-Tube channel are part and evidence within various criminal investigations both nationally and internationally into genocide. This at the request of No Cancer Foundation (NCF) and the Ecological Knowledge Centre (EKC) Which is in current research. Including Chemtrails. Regarding videos are inextricably part of the investigation and public documents Thereby That can not be removed. You-Tube would be guilty of under-mining various international judicial investigations on Genocide, and Thereby forming part of this.



No Cancer Foundation is an international humanitarian organization fighting "for" human rights  "against" industrial mass poisoning, cancer and other diseases poisoning. NCF represents all the world's inhabitants, and provides a platform for all those who want positive change to inform responsible officials and a strong signal  request to take the content that can be seen. repeated and inserted as content knowledge 

YouTube video

This organization aims to build bridges between governments and citizens to provide for all parties. Still jointly democratic solutions bridge  Violations of laws and regulations need to be addressed so that injustice, discrimination and current stealth killer mass poisoning at high profits directly the population Agenda 21 belong to the past, under the guise of sustainability and innovation, and human rights are respected again. "Every public officer or officer in performance of his duties becomes aware of a crime or misdemeanor, is obliged to inform the public prosecutor. Immediately post 
Belgian Federal Government
https://sites.google.com/site/ncfwhistleblower/memorandum-van-koning-leopold-iii
For this reason,  we request (the People) , the  Belgian federal government  aims to decide in accordance with the  Belgian Constitution  will have to be given to it by King Leopold III, completed on January 25, 1944 "still carry Political Testament "as the Constitution, and or on the basis of the following facts:

Formal petition of 31 January 2013  with ( receipt ) to the Belgian Federal Government with additional  formal application of 19 April 2013  ( acknowledgment

Each Member of Parliament and Senator must take an oath, in one of the three official languages. That oath reads: 

I swear to observe the Constitution.
You jure d'observer la Constitution.
Ich schwöre who Verfassung zu reck. 

The search for the truth begins here, l uister to everyone, read everything, believe nothing "unless" you can prove from our own research, then, 


Kings and Queens


See our letter of May 27, 2012 by Princess Maxima of the Netherlands;
- See our letter of May 27, 2012 at Queen Albert II of the Belgians;
- See our letter of  February 11, 2014  (English) to Queen Maxima of the Netherlands;
- See our letter of February 26, 2014 English) to King Philip I of the Belgians ;  
European Parliament
- See our letter of  May 27, 2012  to Herman van  Rumpuy President of Europe;
United Nations

- See our formal application dated April 2, 2013  at the United Nations (UN)  video  to aid in the stopping of current N acetic collaboration and  depopulation " Agenda 21 " ( registered  and sent by e-mail ).
North Atlantic Treaty Organization
https://sites.google.com/site/ncfnocancerfoundation/anders-fogh-rasmussen-opperbevelhebber-van-de-navo-speelt-onverminderd-de-zwarte-piet-door-aan-rusland-op-alle-fronten
Formal petition of October 20, 2011 to Anders Fogh Rasmussen, chief of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)  video   a lsook formal application dated 26 June 2014 to stop sneaking murderous chemical genocide.
European Commission
https://sites.google.com/site/ncfwhistleblowers/home/barroso-gloomy.jpg
Formal petition from 20 October 2011  to  José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission  video  to stop sneaking murderous chemical genocide.
European Court of Justice

Formal application of 21 July 2011  to the European Court Of Justice against the State of the Netherlands with an additional  formal letter of August 8, 2011  to the European Court Registrar Attn Emmanuel Coulon, Rue du Fort Niedergrünewald, L-2925 Luxembourg.

It is time for citizens to be informed!
NCF Whistleblowers apologizes for YouTube  removed   the legal underpinnings  videos
Videos on  the NCF Whistleblower YouTube channel forms part and evidence within various criminal investigations into genocide, both nationally and internationally launched by No Cancer Foundation (NCF) and the Ecological Knowledge Centre (EKC) and in ongoing research. Also, because of Chemtrails. These videos are inextricably part of the investigation and are thereby public documents that can not be removed. YouTube might be guilty of undermining various international surveys on Genocide and forming part thereof.